Globalists and identitarians: Why I oppose them both

identity europa

It has often been said by some on the right that the current political spectrum is not left vs. right, but rather globalism vs. nationalism. The definition of globalism is fairly self-explanatory. It’s the idea that we should live in a world with no national borders (thus no sovereign states), governed by one or more international bodies who all adhere to a set of ideas that are in some ways rooted in cultural Marxist thought. Nationalists, meanwhile, believe in the value of a sovereign state with the rest to self-determination.

However, nationalists aren’t the subject of this post. In recent months, a group called Génération Identitaire has been making waves since last month, after they attempted to block a boat that allegedly was carrying African migrants. Since then, members of the group have attempted to rationalise their actions claiming that they are merely adopting the tactics that were already successful when used by left-wing activists. Even Lauren Southern, a formerly respectable journalist turned alt-right activist, went down this rabbit hole last week, in a video wherein she defends her embrace of far-right identity politics.

This isn’t the only reason I think identitarians are no different to SJW’s however. Identitarians generally want to preserve some semblance of their native cultural identity (in this case European identity), but how might they go about achieving that? The problem with a society that tried to preserve a notion of “cultural identity” is that in order for it to be even possible, an identitarian society must inevitably become an authoritarian society in order to ensure the cohesiveness of said “European identity”. I’m sure they have no qualms with that, considering that the far-right identitarians reject democracy altogether.

My main problem with the identitarians is that to achieve their long-term goals would require a totalitarian system to be implemented. I agree with the identitarians only on the point that mass immigration needs to be curtailed because it is becoming unsustainable, but I think this issue can be solved democratically, especially once the SJW’s stop being a nuisance. The problem is that whenever people try to take ownership of a culture, as I believe the identitarians secretly want to do, they end up nearly destroying it. For a few historical examples, the Nazis burned books that went against their ideology, Francisco Franco banned the Basque language and tried to destroy the Basque and Catalan cultures, and Mao Tse Tung tried to destroy every article of pre-Communist Chinese culture he and his student minions could get his hands on.

Every self-appointed defender of their culture who’s tried to take control of it has ended up nearly destroying it, and given the chance, I believe that the identitarians in the alt-right would do the same. In practice and in principle, I think that the identitarians are no different to the social justice warriors on the far-left. After all, the social justice warriors are so focused on protecting BAME culture from the clutches of white people, but in doing so they would isolate different cultures by ethnicity, and stunt their development.

Don’t get me wrong, I oppose globalism all the same, but not for entirely the same reasons as the identitarians might. My main reason for opposing globalism is because it is the ultimate enemy of liberty. Robbing nations of their sovereign identity notwithstanding, the creation of a globalist system would require an extremely authoritarian system with an impossibly large, centralised government. Liberty can’t exist in such a system, and in such a system where all the power and the money are concentrated into the hands of a global elite, personal choice and freedom of opportunity would be crushed. I also oppose globalism because I know that the problems society faces now, along with the complete degradation of modern culture, are the result of decades-long shift towards globalism.

It is the globalists that have caused the economic sickness that we in the West live with today, not that I expect identitarians to be concerned with economics, and that’s another problem I have with these alt-right identitarian types. Social (or indeed racial) issues come first, economics comes second. Ask a neo-Nazi what economic policy he might want to implement and I doubt he’ll give you a coherent answer, unless they’re directly quoting from the Hitler playbook. But their views one economics might be oddly similar with that of the socialists – they both despise capitalism. It is said that it was easy to convert a nazi into a communist and vice versa, because both hated Western liberal values, and both hated capitalism. Adolf Hitler, a socialist who ran a command economy, viewed the Great Depression as a sign of capitalism’s supposed failures, and of the need for state intervention. I have no reason to assume that the identitarians give a damn about free market economics, and for me that’s a big problem because I firmly believe in free market capitalism. If the identitarians and the alt-right wanted to dismantle that system, even if to oppose globalism, I would oppose them.

So there you have it. I oppose globalists because they’re the rotten, corrupt establishment we have today, and I oppose identitarians because their ideology is frankly a retarded brand of collectivism all the same. They’re the sort of people that we conservatives rightly distance ourselves from (not least because the left-wing media uncharitably lumps the far-right extremists in with the rest of us whenever they get the opportunity), and why not? They don’t want anything to do with us more moderately right-wing conservatives. To them, I may as well be the equivalent of a left-wing pinko because I want the government out of my bedroom and my wallet.

What bothers me more is supposedly more moderate conservatives like Lauren Southern going to bed with these extremist identitarians and abandoning all sense of principle in the process. They honestly believe that these people are their friends because they have the same enemy, but the reason I don’t see it that way is because once in power the identitarians would turn on the very concept of rights, and they’d shit on the US Constitution if they felt like it. They would be just as authoritarian as the social justice warriors we all criticise, and that alone should be reason enough to stay away from these people.

Advertisements

Is it really worth it?

Over the past two months, one thing that became a thorny issue in my life is the Welsh language. Because I live in Wales, I’m surrounded by it, but I’ve never spoken a word of Welsh, or any other foreign language for that matter. In college, that might be about to change.

In my course, I have to do an abominable subject called the Welsh Baccalaureate. The lecturer kept on defaulting on various aspects of the unit, and worst of all, began endorsing the “Learndirect Welsh language course”. This secondary course is being implemented because apparently the powers that be have decided that anyone doing Welsh Bac to learn basic Welsh words.

learndirect

Pictured: Something infuriating

I didn’t know what it was yet, but naturally, when it was announced in November, I was royally pissed off. To me, it was Wales trying to force it’s language down my throat. I never wanted anything to do with the Welsh language when I was a kid, and now that I’m almost twenty, they’ve decided to try and make me learn the language.

Of course, I did go on a blazing rant in class when it was announced, but not only did that not change the lecturers mind, I actually wound up feeling incredibly depressed because I felt like I had just alienated myself from my classmates. Thankfully, everything is still good between me and my classmates, but I still stand by my convictions. I felt that, by participating in that program (which I’m being made to do anyway), I would be allowing Welsh nationalists to have an unwanted influence over my life by giving them what they want.

Before you get the wrong idea, I’ve got nothing against the Welsh language. In fact, I’m fine with people learning the language, but only if they do so on their own free will. I believe that you shouldn’t have to learn the Welsh language if you don’t want to. To put it bluntly, I have to oppose that program because I believe in free choice, something the Welsh government obviously doesn’t believe in.

It’s not entirely my fault. When I was a kid, I spent the formative years of my childhood in America. Most people I know in Wales probably went to school learning both Welsh and English. I, however, did not. I learned to talk in America, but the time I spent there created a massive language barrier between me and the Welsh language. Also, I was raised with an American mindset, so the Welsh language, to me, ended up becoming part of the culture shock I felt while settling back into Wales.

When they first tried to teach Welsh to me in 2005 (back in Pembroke Dock), I didn’t like the lessons. They must have thought that an autistic boy like me wouldn’t cope in Welsh class, because in secondary school, they left Welsh out of my timetable, while everyone else did Welsh.

Yes, the Welsh language is a part of the country’s heritage, but I think that the task of preserving it shouldn’t be handled by people who just want an excuse to be major assholes to the rest of us. I just hope that the Welsh language doesn’t became so prominent that I’d have to move to America just to get a job.

The moral of the story is this: where and how you were raised as a kid will have a profound effect on your world view when you’re older.